The
 artist Carrie Mae Weems recalls sitting at her desk in Syracuse in 2014
 “feeling very anonymous and misunderstood and trying to figure out how 
to make some new work” when she got the call.
“I
 was offered this extraordinary gift,” she said. “It was important, 
because I needed the money, but more than anything, I needed the 
encouragement and the support to keep making, to keep pushing — to 
continue to work in spite of all of the pressures.”
The
 gift is part of a grant program that has paid out a total of $5.5 
million over the last 22 years to support underrecognized female artists
 over age 40. It is called Anonymous Was a Woman,
 in reference to a line in Virginia Woolf’s “A Room of One’s Own,” to 
pay tribute to female artists in history who signed their paintings 
“Anonymous” so that their work would be taken seriously.
The
 donor behind the prize wanted to remain unknown. But now she is 
stepping out from behind the curtain: Susan Unterberg, herself a once 
underrecognized female artist over 40. In a recent interview at her 
Upper East Side home, she said she has decided to come forward so that 
she can more openly argue on behalf of women who are artists, 
demonstrate the importance of women supporting women and try to inspire 
other philanthropists.
Advertisement
“It’s a great time for women to speak up,” Ms. Unterberg said. “I feel I can be a better advocate having my own voice.”
Ms.
 Unterberg, who turns 77 this weekend and is based in New York, has her 
photographic work in a few major museum collections — including the 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Modern Art and the Jewish Museum — and she had a career retrospective
 at the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati in 2004. But she said she
 has experienced firsthand the hurdles faced by female artists all over 
the world.
“They
 don’t get museum shows as often as men, they don’t command the same 
prices in the art world,” she said. “And it doesn’t seem to be 
changing.”
Statistics
 cited by the National Museum of Women in the Arts show that female 
artists earn 81 cents for every dollar made by male artists; that work 
by female artists makes up just 3 percent to 5 percent of major 
permanent museum collections in the United States and Europe; and that 
of some 590 major exhibitions by nearly 70 institutions in the United 
States from 2007 through 2013, only 27 percent were devoted to female 
artists.
“Women continue to be 
seriously undervalued and underappreciated,” Ms. Weems said. “The work 
is not taken as seriously, and men are still running the game. Men in 
power support men in power, and they want to see men in power.”
Advertisement
Just recently, the National Gallery in London acquired
 an artwork by a female artist for the first time in 27 years (a 
self-portrait by the Italian Baroque painter Artemisia Gentileschi). And
 the Ford Foundation was among several organizations that recently 
received a letter from the curator Helen Molesworth about the 
possibility of starting a Time’s Up for Museums, borrowing the goal of a
 Hollywood group’s push for equality — 50/50 by 2020.
“Is
 now the time for a field-wide call for gender parity in all aspects of 
the profession?” Ms. Molesworth writes. “How might we bring the pressure
 of our current moment into our programming, our presentation of 
permanent collections, the way we pursue acquisitions, etc.?”
Ms.
 Unterberg said she had chosen to keep her identity secret so that her 
art would be evaluated on its own terms — even her grown grandchildren 
were unaware she was behind the grant. “I was working really hard to 
become known as a contemporary artist,” Ms. Unterberg said. “And this I 
felt would have influenced the way people looked at my work or saw me.”
“I’m a private person,” she added, “and I didn’t mind being unknown.”
As
 the founder and sole patron of the grant program, Ms. Unterberg has 
supported 220 artists with funds from the foundation she and her sister,
 Jill Roberts, inherited after their father, Nathan Appleman, an oilman and philanthropist, died in 1992.
Image

She
 was moved to start the program in 1996 when the National Endowment for 
the Arts ended grants for individuals, as a way to give fellow female 
artists the kind of support she knew they needed, especially in the 
middle stage of their careers.
Advertisement
She got the idea while brainstorming with Marcia Tucker,
 the forceful curator and founder of the New Museum. “Since I was a 
middle-aged artist and always wanted to support women — I’m a feminist —
 this seemed like the perfect vehicle,” Ms. Unterberg said.
Past
 winners — many of whom have gone on to present solo exhibitions at 
institutions including the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Solomon 
R. Guggenheim Museum and the Venice Biennale — have included Louise 
Lawler, Tania Bruguera, Carolee Schneemann and Mickalene Thomas.
The
 artists who have received the $25,000 grant have long wondered about 
the person — or people — behind it. “It’s such a special form of 
generosity to do that anonymously,” said Nicole Eisenman, who received a
 grant in 2014. “The lack of ego and the pure altruism in this grant is a
 beautiful thing.”
The women are 
nominated and evaluated by other women in the field — curators, art 
writers and previous winners, who themselves are not identified. The 
five panelists on the selection committee — who have changed over the 
years — deliberate for a full day and are each paid $1,000 for their 
time.
The award is not need-based; 
women simply have to be over 40 (it used to be over 30 but changed early
 on) and at a crossroads in their practice, which they explain in their 
applications.
“It came right on time,” said Amy Sherald,
 who received the award in 2017 before it was announced that she would 
be painting Michelle Obama for the National Portrait Gallery.
Advertisement
“The
 time I got the check I actually was at a point where I couldn’t pay my 
rent,” she said in a telephone interview. “I had $1,500 left and that’s 
exactly what my rent was. The announcement of the portrait had just come
 out and I was sitting there flat broke. It saved my life in terms of 
securing my studio to make that portrait.”
An
 assessment of the grant, commissioned from the curator Laura Hoptman, 
was completed in 2004. After reviewing the testimonies of some 70 
recipients, Ms. Hoptman said the psychological benefit had proven as 
decisive as the financial one, citing “a validation of their standing in
 the art community, a recognition of their past achievements, as well as
 a strong vote of confidence in their ability to continue to produce 
meaningful work.”
Obvious from the 
testimonies, Ms. Hoptman added, “is the life-changing quality of a 
well-deserved, substantial grant that comes from nowhere.”
“The terms most often used in this sampling,” she said, “were ‘lifesaver’ and ‘miracle.’”
Indeed,
 going public is likely to elicit some messages of gratitude, but Ms. 
Unterberg said she never awarded the grants for recognition. “It’s 
thanks enough knowing I’ve helped people’s lives when they needed it,” 
she said, adding, “I’ll miss the secret pleasure of seeing people 
benefit from afar without my name being attached.”
Ms.
 Unterberg — who is also finishing a five-year tenure as a chairwoman of
 the board of Yaddo, the artists’ retreat — said she will continue to 
underwrite the award, though no longer as a voting member of the 
selection panel.
The need for this 
type of support, Ms. Unterberg said, remains as pronounced as it was 
when she started. “It’s still a political moment two decades later,” she
 said, adding that the National Endowment for the Arts “is still under 
threat and women are still facing challenges in midcareer.”
“I’m eager for the grant to become better known,” she said. “Women have been anonymous for far too long.”
 









 
                    
                

 But we need the world to understand why, before it’s too late…
                But we need the world to understand why, before it’s too late… Trump’s
                Trump’s  Trump bought his home in Palm Beach, Florida for $41 
million. A few years later, with no real increase in the value -- he 
sold it for $95 million -- the most expensive home in America at the 
time! Why?
                Trump bought his home in Palm Beach, Florida for $41 
million. A few years later, with no real increase in the value -- he 
sold it for $95 million -- the most expensive home in America at the 
time! Why?  Trump's real estate deals were often fuelled by Russian money, typically passed through shady
                Trump's real estate deals were often fuelled by Russian money, typically passed through shady  Trump’s financial broker and “Senior Advisor” was a Russian convicted felon named
                Trump’s financial broker and “Senior Advisor” was a Russian convicted felon named  Trump’s other main business is casinos -- which are classic money laundering vehicles. One of his casinos was
                Trump’s other main business is casinos -- which are classic money laundering vehicles. One of his casinos was  
